The cheapest place to fix a vulnerability is the source
Dynamic testing finds what an attacker can reach from outside. Code review finds the things they haven't reached yet — the authorisation check that's missing on one endpoint, the deserialisation path no fuzzer triggered, the secret committed three releases ago. These are the flaws that surface at the worst possible moment.
We pair experienced manual review with static analysis, because tools find patterns and people find intent. Business-logic flaws — the ones that pass every linter — are where attackers and our reviewers both spend their time.
What we do
- Read the code. Manual review of authentication, authorisation, input handling, and trust boundaries by reviewers who write code themselves.
- Run SAST. Static analysis sweeps the full codebase for known-dangerous patterns, then we triage the output so you don't drown in noise.
- Hunt logic flaws. We trace how your application actually behaves to find abuse paths no scanner models.
- Strengthen the SDLC. Findings come with guidance to stop the same class of bug recurring.
Mapped to standards your auditors know
Findings reference OWASP ASVS, the OWASP Top 10, and CWE, giving Singapore and India engineering teams a vocabulary that maps directly to compliance and customer security questionnaires.